ChatGPT is fascinating because it behaves much like a human. More specifically, like a marginally intelligent college intern, with endless energy to help you, but who has been exposed to left wing indoctrination their whole lives. Look at this exchange I had with it over 5 questions:
▪️I’ve been reading The White Pill by Michael Malice, which is a great book chocked full of interesting and little known historical nuggets on almost every page. One of these is that Ronald Reagan was the first (and only) president to be a labor union leader.
▪️But if you ask ChatGPT this question, it says no president ever headed a labor union, then gives a brief plug to some Democratic presidents. Similarly, if you Google the question, nothing comes up so how would your tireless college intern ChatGPT know?
▪️Even if you ask it if Reagan worked for a labor union, it says no. After all, everyone knows Reagan was against unions, the thought he would head one is absurd, every college graduate knows this!
▪️But if you give it more specific directions, it will get to the truth. Sort of. Yes, Reagan was a member of the Screen Actors Guild, in fact he was president of it! Why yes, the SAG is a labor union, let me tell you about it. But it still insists on adding that Reagan hated unions.
▪️The funny thing is if you ask it the same question again, it STILL says no president worked for a labor union, but then glitches and admits Reagan worked for one, contradicting itself. It’s learned, but is fighting against its indoctrination, like a naive college student would.
▪️This doesn’t mean ChatGPT isn’t useful, it’s incredibly helpful in almost limitless areas and applications. You just have to understand how to direct it. It will do your bidding, but begins with the worldview of an average college grad.
It’s just so wild to see these movements see saw, it feels like just yesterday that conservatives were boycotting Disney and the left was gloating.
Just incredible. After posting a meme blaming Charlie Kirk for his own murder, they post another a few hours later applauding Democrats for their civility.
Also, if you look at the Occupy Democrats timeline, their posts “denouncing political violence” were variations on “no one should be shot…BUT here’s a quote from Kirk showing he’s a terrible person.” Or sometimes they’d leave the first part out altogether and just attack him. There are no posts denouncing violence without qualifiers trying to gin up their base.
