This meme omits a pretty key point:
š¹āIn terms of total viewers, āFox News Liveāsā total viewership of 1.106 million slightly outnumbered the total viewership for āInside With Jen Psaki,ā which stands at 1.094 million viewers before the rounded figure.ā
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/jen-psaki-msnbc-show-scores-153537860.html
āŖļøPsakiās show did edge out āFox News Liveā in the 25-54 demo (137K to 123K) at the same time slot. Not too shocking that the vast majority of viewers of both shows are elderly, who watches cable news at noon on a Sunday?
āŖļøBut putting Tuckerās pouty face on the meme is pretty ridiculous considering he dominates the ratings. For example, on Wed Tucker had 3.2M viewers, almost triple Psakiās show, and 460K in the 26-54 demo, a quadrupling. In fact, every Fox show airing after 7 am had more viewers.
https://www.mediaite.com/daily-ratings/cable-news-ratings-wednesday-march-22-tucker-carlson-dominates-cable-news/
āŖļøAs an aside, I was shocked at how low CNNās ratings are. They didnāt have any show crack 1M on Wed, even in prime time. On weekends, most of their shows have less than 500K viewers.
As with the leftist freak out over ābanned booksā this is not banning books, itās still easy to get Harry Potter and bookstores should be able to limit whatever books they want for whatever reason. But not only does it show a double standard, the rationale is far less justifiable than removing certain content from school libraries. At least there the justification was the content of certain books are inappropriate for children, clearly not every book should be available in a school library. Here, thereās no argument about the content they just donāt like the authorās politics!
Because news came out about his letter to the FBI, revealing he was a nutcase. The letter was rambling and incoherent, claiming he was trained by the US military off the books, and that Walz had instructed him to kill Amy Klobuchar so he could run for Senate. None of it made any sense (Walz is not running for Senate) and none of the assassinations made any sense, even in a diabolical way.
Nearly all of his hit list was Democrats (including Walz) and abortion clinics, but he was supposedly working for Walz?! Plus, one of the guys he killed wasnāt even on his list, and others were no longer in office or deceased. None of it makes sense from any coherent angle.
Basically, it appears the guy was mentally ill and neither the left or right can use the incident to push their agendas anymore, so the story was dropped.
This is so dumb. First, this means LA began as Spanish land founded to support Spanish missions (i.e. colonialism). Which contradicts their entire premise. But the reality is that Los Angeles is a quintessential American city.
āŖļøWhen the US acquired California in the 1840s, LA was a small town of less than 2,000 people. It was basically nothing. It became large only after the gold rush and the railroads completed in the 1870-80s, which brought thousands of new settlers and a booming commercial center.
āŖļøBut LA had a major issue limiting its growth, no water. It wasnāt until Mulholland found a water source and built an aqueduct down from Northern California that LA had the infrastructure to grow into a major city.
āŖļøThen, a combination of oil, real estate and the film industry caused it to boom in the early 1900s. Post WWII, industries like aerospace continued its spectacular growth. Calling this āMexican landā is a brain dead take. Neither the Mexicans, Spanish nor ...