This meme makes it seem like minors in Florida are “forced to give birth” and/or need a judge’s approval, which is misleading without context.
▪️In FL, a minor needs parental consent for an abortion. This isn’t unique to FL, 27 states require parental consent and 36 require parental involvement (FL is one of just 6 states which requires parental notification & consent, although not sure how you’d get consent w/out notification)
https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/parental-involvement-minors-abortions
▪️These parental consent laws were in place long before the Dobbs decision overturned Roe, in fact this headline is from a case that happened in 2020, when Roe was still in place.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/7k8gxq/judges-denied-14-year-old-abortion#
▪️This particular case involved a girl who said her mother lived in Guatemala & she lost touch with her father, thus couldn’t get consent. In this case, minors must get a judge to approve their abortion. The judge in this case had questions about the location of her mother & her credibility. It’s unknown if the girl ended up getting an abortion or not.
▪️Advocates may have a point about FL’s cumbersome legal process for minors without legal guardians being unfair, but this affects a tiny minority. The Vice article claims 342 have been denied by courts in the past 15 years, which is only 22/yr. And many get it changed on appeal.
▪️The reality is that, like most states, minors in FL are free to get abortions provided they get parental consent. And now 13 year olds can’t get social media accounts. Linking these two together as being hypocritical seems quite a stretch.
As with the leftist freak out over “banned books” this is not banning books, it’s still easy to get Harry Potter and bookstores should be able to limit whatever books they want for whatever reason. But not only does it show a double standard, the rationale is far less justifiable than removing certain content from school libraries. At least there the justification was the content of certain books are inappropriate for children, clearly not every book should be available in a school library. Here, there’s no argument about the content they just don’t like the author’s politics!
Because news came out about his letter to the FBI, revealing he was a nutcase. The letter was rambling and incoherent, claiming he was trained by the US military off the books, and that Walz had instructed him to kill Amy Klobuchar so he could run for Senate. None of it made any sense (Walz is not running for Senate) and none of the assassinations made any sense, even in a diabolical way.
Nearly all of his hit list was Democrats (including Walz) and abortion clinics, but he was supposedly working for Walz?! Plus, one of the guys he killed wasn’t even on his list, and others were no longer in office or deceased. None of it makes sense from any coherent angle.
Basically, it appears the guy was mentally ill and neither the left or right can use the incident to push their agendas anymore, so the story was dropped.
This is so dumb. First, this means LA began as Spanish land founded to support Spanish missions (i.e. colonialism). Which contradicts their entire premise. But the reality is that Los Angeles is a quintessential American city.
▪️When the US acquired California in the 1840s, LA was a small town of less than 2,000 people. It was basically nothing. It became large only after the gold rush and the railroads completed in the 1870-80s, which brought thousands of new settlers and a booming commercial center.
▪️But LA had a major issue limiting its growth, no water. It wasn’t until Mulholland found a water source and built an aqueduct down from Northern California that LA had the infrastructure to grow into a major city.
▪️Then, a combination of oil, real estate and the film industry caused it to boom in the early 1900s. Post WWII, industries like aerospace continued its spectacular growth. Calling this “Mexican land” is a brain dead take. Neither the Mexicans, Spanish nor ...
